[ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-1 - Last Call
Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz
Thu Apr 26 15:41:37 EDT 2007
At 18:56 +0000 4/26/07, =?UTF-8?B?QmlsbCBXb29kY29jaw==?= wrote:
>The number 5 _was_ in the proposal, but both that and the phrase "crypt-auth"
>were deemed unnecessary by staff, and the authors and AC agreed, so they won't
>be part of the final policy.
Here's where the IRPEP gets confusing to me. The number 5 is in the
last call message and it is still on the proposal version on the web
site (URL given in my previous message and appears below).
>I would point out that this is the public POLICY mailing list, and that the
>details of crypto implementation, should ARIN staff not just adopt wholesale
>one of the preexisting implementations, are probably best discussed with
>staff, rather than on this mailing list.
In the spirit of public policy review...shouldn't the last call cover
what it is we want to last call? Does staff have permission to
ignore parts of the policies?
And considering that you are one of the authors...shouldn't the
details have been revised out already?
>From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz>
>Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:26:33
>To:"Stephen Sprunk" <stephen at sprunk.org>
>Cc:ARIN PPML <ppml at arin.net>, Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz>
>Subject: Re: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-1 - Last Call
Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468
Sarcasm doesn't scale.
More information about the ARIN-PPML