[ppml] 2006-2 v6 internal microallocation

[Aaron Dudek]

What happens when ARIN can no longer contact them or if they have decided 
to cut contact with ARIN?

Aaron Dudek
(703) 689-6879
Sprintlink Engineering
adudek at sprint.net


On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com wrote:

>> The thing about which I wonder more though is why a codified sunset
>> for the allocation, which basically forces a migration upon the
>> adopters at such time as ARIN decides that you can stick a fork in the
>> technology because it's baked, would make the policy proposal more
>> (instead of radically less) palatable?  Am I missing something here?
>
> I think that any kind of sunset or expiry clause is
> a bad idea. As long as ARIN maintains contact with
> the organizations who receive the addresses, then
> there is the possibility of a future policy change
> that involves returning those addresses.
>
> Today, we are completely ignorant of the situation
> in three year's time so we can't show any good reason
> for forcing the migration. But, in three years, ARIN
> will have the facts at their disposal and all the affected
> parties will be able to join in the decision making.
> It is better to leave the decision to a later date
> and remove any sundown provisions.
>
> --Michael Dillon
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
>