[ppml] ARIN member in good standing?

Peter Sherbin pesherb at yahoo.com
Fri Sep 29 11:51:50 EDT 2006


A few months back there was a concern posted on this list that providers are not
vocal enough in defining ARIN policy. For us as a national provider uncounted
traffic is an issue, which you seem do not want to hear. Way to go for more
participation.

Peter

--- Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com wrote:

> > > You would bill the packet originator, not the destination?
> > 
> > Yes, the originator of the packet pays to a transport provider
> 
> I don't know why you are discussing this here.
> It has nothing to do with ARIN and certainly nothing
> whatsoever to do with ARIN policies.
> 
> Given that we now know that similar billing practices
> in the telco industries caused over 70% of all charges
> to be spent on billing systems and billing support
> systems such as data collection, we can estimate that
> implementing such a policy would increase everyone's
> Internet access charges by at least 3 times. Of course
> the money would be spent on many things thereby increasing
> employment nationwide, however, it seems to me that
> a policy to create two job in every household belongs on 
> some other list.
> 
> --Michael Dillon
> _______________________________________________
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 



More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list