[ppml] Proposed Policy: Changes to IPv6 initial allocation criteria
andrew.dul at quark.net
Thu Oct 12 14:56:53 EDT 2006
> -------Original Message-------
> From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
> Subject: Re: [ppml] Proposed Policy: Changes to IPv6 initial allocation criteria
> Sent: 12 Oct '06 10:34
> Hi Andrew,
> I see your point.
> I don't think that makes too much difference and the people that apply for a
> prefix is really because they want to do business with that prefix. However,
> I agree that an alternative text (removing also the /48) could be:
> "be an existing, known ISP in the ARIN region or have a plan for making
> assignments to other organizations within five years."
> My understanding is that this is different policy proposal and I will be
> happy to submit it also, so we have two choices (this one a bit more
> The question here is to ask for ARIN staff or AC advise. Should I submit one
> more proposal, or can both choices somehow be considered as part of the same
> one ?
I don't think we need seperate policies. I don't see the differences between them as very large. I would hope over time that people would draw to consenus on one version of the text. I think that can be done through the mailing list and at the next meeting.
More information about the ARIN-PPML