[ppml] Proposed Policy: Changes to IPv6 initial allocation criteria

Andrew Dul andrew.dul at quark.net
Thu Oct 12 14:56:53 EDT 2006

>  -------Original Message-------
>  From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
>  Subject: Re: [ppml] Proposed Policy: Changes to IPv6 initial allocation criteria
>  Sent: 12 Oct '06 10:34
>  Hi Andrew,
>  I see your point.
>  I don't think that makes too much difference and the people that apply for a
>  prefix is really because they want to do business with that prefix. However,
>  I agree that an alternative text (removing also the /48) could be:
>  "be an existing, known ISP in the ARIN region or have a plan for making
>  assignments to other organizations within five years."
>  My understanding is that this is different policy proposal and I will be
>  happy to submit it also, so we have two choices (this one a bit more
>  "conservative").
>  The question here is to ask for ARIN staff or AC advise. Should I submit one
>  more proposal, or can both choices somehow be considered as part of the same
>  one ?

I don't think we need seperate policies.  I don't see the differences between them as very large.  I would hope over time that people would draw to consenus on one version of the text.   I think that can be done through the mailing list and at the next meeting.


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list