[ppml] Proposed Policy: Changes to IPv6 initial allocation criteria

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ]

Hi Andrew,

I see your point.

I don't think that makes too much difference and the people that apply for a
prefix is really because they want to do business with that prefix. However,
I agree that an alternative text (removing also the /48) could be:

"be an existing, known ISP in the ARIN region or have a plan for making
assignments to other organizations within five years."

My understanding is that this is different policy proposal and I will be
happy to submit it also, so we have two choices (this one a bit more
"conservative").

The question here is to ask for ARIN staff or AC advise. Should I submit one
more proposal, or can both choices somehow be considered as part of the same
one ?

Regards,
Jordi




> De: Andrew Dul <andrew.dul at quark.net>
> Responder a: Andrew Dul <andrew.dul at quark.net>
> Fecha: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:22:10 +0000
> Para: <ppml at arin.net>
> Asunto: Re: [ppml] Proposed Policy: Changes to IPv6 initial allocation
> criteria
> 
>>  Policy statement:
>>  
>>  Delete section 6.5.1.1 d. of NRPM
>>  
>> d:  be an existing, known ISP in the ARIN region or have a plan for making at
>> least 200 /48 assignments to other > organizations within five years.
> 
> My main understanding of why this policy might be needed is that some feel
> that the 200 /48 assignments is an arbitrary requirement.  Some feel that this
> type of requirement would encourage a smaller LIR to provide false information
> to ARIN in order to obtain PA address space.
> 
> If the problem is with the 200 /48 requirements, I would suggest just striking
> the words ³at least 200² from the policy rather than removing the entire
> requirement.
> 
> I do not think that small ISPs should use the PI address space policy to a
> bootstrap to getting PA address space later.
> 
> Andrew
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml




**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org

Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
http://www.ipv6day.org

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.