[ppml] for your reading pleasure

[Randy Bush]

>> I must admit that I do not see much in the way of recommendations in
>> this document, nor do I see a strong need for it.
> One need is to make clear that 3177 has been superceded, and that folk
> should stop pointing to it for justification of things. Note that in
> the past, at some RIR meetings, people have made reference to 3177 and
> wondered if it was appropriate to change the /48 policy given the
> existance of 3177. Also, it's useful to the IETF community to have it
> go through the formal steps of recognizing that 3177 needs to be
> updated/replaced.

thank you for that

> To be clear, this document is not intended to make a recommendation on
> what the RIRs should do. But it does want to make clear that
> updating/changing the current /48 recommendation is reasonable, from
> an architectural/standards perspective.

same

thank you!

randy