[ppml] "Recommended Practices" procedure
tme at multicasttech.com
Thu Jun 29 15:17:14 EDT 2006
On Jun 29, 2006, at 3:11 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> --On June 29, 2006 8:59:57 AM -0700 Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
>>> How do you propose to do this? Should large service providers
>>> a (likely very long) list of all known /48 PA multihomers?
>> actually, there is a proposal in apnic, which i support, that
>> real multihomers be given a /48 (or shorter if justified) out
>> of a specific /32. seems like the best compromise we can get
>> at the moment.
> That is, in essence, what 2005-1 does in ARIN.
No, 2005-1 requires a /22 in IPv4. prop-035-v001 does not. As I read
it, you don't even need any IPv4 usage.
> If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net
More information about the ARIN-PPML