[ppml] Proposed Change to AC Initial Review Period

cja@daydream.com packetgrrl at gmail.com
Thu Jan 26 11:08:31 EST 2006


Ed,

The AC has regularly scheduled meetings.  Sometimes because of the 10 day
requirement we have to meet just before a regularly scheduled meeting when
we could just wait a couple more days and have our regular meeting. We have
the regularly scheduled meeting times because it is difficult to get enough
of us together at random times.  It seemed reasonable that we should use
that regular schedule in the review process as well.  If we need to meet
more than once a month we're willing to do that and have done that.  No one
is trying to prevent that.

Thanks!
---Cathy

On 1/26/06, Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz> wrote:
>
> This makes sense to me.  But I want to ask for some clarification to make
> sure.
>
> The sentence "The proposed change would allow the AC to meet no more
> than monthly to perform this task" can be taken to meaning either
>
> a) we want to alleviate the AC from having to meet more than once a month
>
> b) we want to prevent the AC from meeting more than once a month
>
> I think the intent is "a".  Is that right?
>
> At 17:20 -0500 1/24/06, Member Services wrote:
> >The ARIN Board of Trustees is soliciting community comment on its intent
> >to change the initial review period by the Advisory Council of a
> >submitted policy proposal. The proposed change would remove the current
> >requirement for an AC review within ten (10) business days from the date
> >the proposal is posted on the public policy mailing list, and instead
> >require the review to take place at the next regularly scheduled meeting
> >of the AC. If the period before the next regularly scheduled meeting is
> >less than 10 days, then the period would be extended to the subsequent
> >regularly scheduled meeting, but the period would not be extended beyond
> >45 days.
> >
> >The rationale for this change is that at the end of the review period
> >the AC is required to take an action.  In order to do this it must
> >convene a meeting. The current criteria could put a burden on the AC as
> >it could prompt the necessity of having very frequent meetings to
> >perform this duty.  The proposed change would allow the AC to meet no
> >more than monthly to perform this task. If you have comments regarding
> >this contemplated Board of Trustees action, please submit them to this
> >list no later than 5 PM Eastern Time, 3 February 2006.
> >
> >Raymond A. Plzak
> >President and CEO
> >American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >PPML mailing list
> >PPML at arin.net
> >http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
>
> --
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Edward
> Lewis                                                +1-571-434-5468
> NeuStar
>
> Nothin' more exciting than going to the printer to watch the toner
> drain...
> _______________________________________________
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20060126/2368a6a8/attachment.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list