[ppml] 2005-1 status

[Marshall Eubanks]

GBP ?

A typo for BGP ? Or some new acronym I should know about ?

(Not a snark, I am just trying to finish this thread before I go to  
the airport.)

Marshall

On Jan 24, 2006, at 6:18 PM, Bill Darte wrote:

>
>
> We should at least learn some lessons from previous routing  
> scalability
> problems.  Personally, I do not believe the routing table growth  
> problem
> will ever be solved until we separate the routing identifier from the
> end
> system identifier.  However, until that is done, we have to look at  
> IPv6
> as it stands.
>
>
> Owen, so OK the conversation continues to be about changing address  
> policy
> and shim6 and deagregations and .....
>
> Why is GBP sacrosanct?  Is there no better method of routing large  
> scale
> networks?  You mention a technique above.  Is this a legitimate  
> pursuit?
> Are there others?  Does the problem we keep arguing about need to  
> be solved
> with tweaks? Seems everything  is about preserving the BGP routing
> tables....isn't there a routing fix?
>
> bd
> _______________________________________________
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml