[ppml] 2005-1 status

[Lea Roberts]

well, seems like maybe we should talk it out here (again... :-) for a
while.  this sounds more like a "PI for everyone" policy.  while I'm sure
there's a large number of people who would like that, I still think it's
unlikely it can reach consensus...

As I said at the meeting in L.A., I still think it is possible to reach
consensus for PI assignments for large organizations and I thought that's
where we were still headed after the last meeting., i.e. trying to find
criteria that the latest round of objectors could live with.

let the discussion begin!				/Lea

On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Owen DeLong wrote:

> Kevin,
> 	Why don't you, Lea, and I take this off line and decide
> what to present back to the group.  I apologize for not having
> followed up in a more timely manner after the last meeting.
>
> Owen
>
> On Jan 23, 2006, at 7:54 AM, Kevin Loch wrote:
>
> > Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> >> Hello;
> >>
> >> When last I saw it, 2005-1 was to be reformatted to something more
> >> like
> >> its original version.
> >
> > These were my suggestions using feedback from the last meeting:
> >
> > To qualify for a minimum end site assignment of /44 you must either:
> >
> >    - have an allocation or assignment directly from ARIN (and not a
> >      legacy allocation or assignment)
> >
> >    OR
> >
> >    - meet the qualifications for an IPv4 assignment from ARIN without
> >      actually requesting one.
> >
> >    OR
> >
> >    - be currently connected to two or more IPv6 providers with at
> > least
> >    one /48 assigned to you by an upstream visible in whois/rwhois.
> >
> > Assignment prefixes shorter than the minimum would be based
> > on some metric and definition of "sites".
> >
> > One practical way to look at sites is by number of connections to
> > separate upstream provider POPs.
> >
> > +--------------------------+
> > | Connections | Assignment |
> > +-------------+------------+
> > |         <12 |     /44    |
> > |       <=192 |     /40    |
> > |      <=3072 |     /36    |
> > |       >3072 |     /32    |
> > +-------------+------------+
> > (C=0.75 * 2^(48-A))
> >
> > Or if /56 becomes the new default PA assignment shift the assignment
> > sizes right 4 bits.
> >
> >>
> >> Can someone tell me what the status of 2005-1 is currently ?
> >
> > As far as I know it hasn't changed since the last meeting.  Obviously
> > it should be updated one way or another.  I would gladly write up a
> > formal revision or new proposal if requested.
> >
> > - Kevin
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PPML mailing list
> > PPML at arin.net
> > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
>