[ppml] 2005-1 status

[Owen DeLong]

Kevin,
	Why don't you, Lea, and I take this off line and decide
what to present back to the group.  I apologize for not having
followed up in a more timely manner after the last meeting.

Owen

On Jan 23, 2006, at 7:54 AM, Kevin Loch wrote:

> Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>> Hello;
>>
>> When last I saw it, 2005-1 was to be reformatted to something more  
>> like
>> its original version.
>
> These were my suggestions using feedback from the last meeting:
>
> To qualify for a minimum end site assignment of /44 you must either:
>
>    - have an allocation or assignment directly from ARIN (and not a
>      legacy allocation or assignment)
>
>    OR
>
>    - meet the qualifications for an IPv4 assignment from ARIN without
>      actually requesting one.
>
>    OR
>
>    - be currently connected to two or more IPv6 providers with at  
> least
>    one /48 assigned to you by an upstream visible in whois/rwhois.
>
> Assignment prefixes shorter than the minimum would be based
> on some metric and definition of "sites".
>
> One practical way to look at sites is by number of connections to
> separate upstream provider POPs.
>
> +--------------------------+
> | Connections | Assignment |
> +-------------+------------+
> |         <12 |     /44    |
> |       <=192 |     /40    |
> |      <=3072 |     /36    |
> |       >3072 |     /32    |
> +-------------+------------+
> (C=0.75 * 2^(48-A))
>
> Or if /56 becomes the new default PA assignment shift the assignment
> sizes right 4 bits.
>
>>
>> Can someone tell me what the status of 2005-1 is currently ?
>
> As far as I know it hasn't changed since the last meeting.  Obviously
> it should be updated one way or another.  I would gladly write up a
> formal revision or new proposal if requested.
>
> - Kevin
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml