[ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv6 Direct PI Assignments for End Sites

[Owen DeLong]

> Sorry I misread. My view is that it should be something like:
> "shall qualify for additional allocation from RIR and is encoraged to
>   consider getting allocation as an LIR"
>
> The end-user organization with /44 already has enough usage to qualify
> as LIR by existing policies I think.

Current policy does not allow an end-organization without external 
downstream
organizations to be treated as an LIR.

Owen



-- 
If this message was not signed with gpg key 0FE2AA3D, it's probably
a forgery.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20060210/08feb6b1/attachment.sig>