[ppml] "Recommended Practices" procedure

[Azinger, Marla]

Tony-  That would be nice if IETF could do this.  The second issue we face is, we need a solution now, not in a year.  Despite some beliefs that V6 isnt going anywhere, there are companies right now starting to deploy to large customers on V6.

Regards
Marla

-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Li [mailto:tli at tropos.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 10:00 AM
To: Azinger, Marla; bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com; 'Jason Schiller
(schiller at uu.net)'
Cc: ppml at arin.net
Subject: RE: [ppml] "Recommended Practices" procedure


 

> What I see frustrating here is that everyone agrees we need 
> some sort of "internet community agreement" that addresses V6 
> routing.  I hear alot of people asking for this, including 
> myself.  Yet I dont hear any specific forum stepping forward 
> to help facilitate this need.


What you're asking for is a "routing and addressing architecture".
Currently, it's really the purview of the IETF, except that they've
basically abdicated the role.  This creates a vacuum, which, as you note
cries out to be filled.  There are multiple ways to make progress here,
but my favorite is for ARIN to simply push the problem back to the IETF
and insist on a sensible and scalable solution.

Tony