[ppml] Policy Proposal 2005-8: Proposal to amend ARIN IPv6 assignment and utilisation requirement - Last Call

[Owen DeLong]

> as we also discussed at the ARIN XVII meeting, it would be useful for
> some group to define guidelines for assignment policy that would clarify
> the issues you raise.  it seems that in ARIN policy is not the correct
> place yet no other group comes to mind.  anyway, as a rough suggestion, I
> would say that end sites should get 4 to 8 times as much address space
> assigned as they think they might use using today's networking techniques.
> 
Perhaps we need a BCP track within ARIN for number resource utilization.
A process similar to, but, potentially a bit less formal than, the IRPEP
which would be used to develop "Recommended Practices for Number Resource
Allocation, Assignment, and Utilization".

I agree this doesn't belong in policy, but, I do think that ARIN might be
the right body to coalesce such information, at least on a regional basis.
Eventually, perhaps parallel capabilities would develop in the other
RIRs supporting an IANA based point to coalesce them on a global basis
where appropriate.

Owen

> I hope that gives you some answers...  :-)		/Lea
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml



-- 
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20060414/3575d068/attachment.sig>