[ppml] Policy Proposal 2005-8: Proposal to amend ARIN IPv6 assignment and utilisation requirement - Last Call

[Owen DeLong]

Jordi,
	The only problem I see with your proposal here is that requiring the
ISP to reserve a /48 means that the ISPs costs are the same whether the end
site accepts a /64, a /56, or a /48.  As such, there would be absolutely no
benefit whatsoever to allowing smaller assignments.  In essence, the cost
structure and requirements you propose would nullify the intent of 2005-8.

Owen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20060414/28af1b6b/attachment.sig>