[ppml] 4.4.2 Micro-allocations for anycast services

[Scott Leibrand]

On 04/11/06 at 10:00am -0400, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:

> However, because at least part of the intent of many anycast implementations
> is to overcome DDoS, it is at least desirable in many of those cases to
> be able to put your anycast stuff in a block that is not directly associated
> with your existing infrastructure.

Perhaps.  This strikes me as a "security through obscurity" argument,
though.

> Just out of curiosity, does the information above address your quibble?

I'm not sure.  I'm having a hard time coming up with any strong opinions
on this subject.  I think I used them all up on PI.  :)

-Scott