[ppml] IPv6 PI Assignment Survey

[Owen DeLong]

--On April 7, 2006 12:34:07 PM -0400 Marshall Eubanks
<tme at multicasttech.com> wrote:

> Thanks for doing this.
> 
> Two places with possible ambiguities :
> 
> - Questions
> 
> 2. I support an IPv6 PI assignment to any organization which  
> qualifies for an IPv4 assignment.
> and
> 3. I support an IPv6 PI policy which requires other criteria. (Other  
> than any IPv4 assignment)
> 
> are not mutually exclusive. (For example, I support a IPv6 only  
> assignment policy for networks
> without a IPv4 footprint.)
> 
> So I answered "yes" to both.
> 
That is as I would expect.

> - Is a minimum assignment the shortest prefix or the smallest block  
> allowed ?
> (and the obvious inverse for maximum)
> 
> I assume smallest block.
> 
You are correct.  Shortest prefix would be a maximum assignment.

Owen


-- 
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20060407/c291a6b5/attachment.sig>