[ppml] IPv6 PI Assignment Survey

[Marshall Eubanks]

Thanks for doing this.

Two places with possible ambiguities :

- Questions

2. I support an IPv6 PI assignment to any organization which  
qualifies for an IPv4 assignment.
and
3. I support an IPv6 PI policy which requires other criteria. (Other  
than any IPv4 assignment)

are not mutually exclusive. (For example, I support a IPv6 only  
assignment policy for networks
without a IPv4 footprint.)

So I answered "yes" to both.

- Is a minimum assignment the shortest prefix or the smallest block  
allowed ?
(and the obvious inverse for maximum)

I assume smallest block.

Regards
Marshall

On Apr 7, 2006, at 12:20 PM, Andrew Dul wrote:

> I'd like to thank Thomas Narten for posting his messages yesterday  
> encouraging people to post their comments to PPML.
>
> I also realize that not everyone can post their comments or wishes  
> to send lots of "me too" emails, but may still want to express  
> their opinion.
>
> I've created an online survey where I've attempted to capture the  
> questions Thomas posted yesterday in an online form.  I'm hopefully  
> that this will help the authors of the two IPv6 PI policies craft  
> an IPv6 PI policy which will gain consensus at the upcoming meeting  
> in Montreal.
>
> Please take a minute and go to the following URL to fill out the  
> short survey.
>
> http://www.quark.net/survey/survey.php?sid=28
>
> This *not* an ARIN sponsored survey, but I will post the results of  
> data that is collected to PPML on Monday morning April 10, 2006.
>
> Thanks for your participation,
> Andrew
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml