[ppml] 2005-1 or its logical successor

[Bill Woodcock]

      On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com wrote:
    > > - in order to avoid creative interpretation of "sites," no more than one
    > >   site per metro area should be counted.  That's arbitrary, but it's an
    > >   objectively-verifiable quantity, which is what's needed for the ARIN
    > >   analyst staff.
    > 
    > No, too restrictive. I agree that we need a verifiable
    > definition of "site" but I think this can be done in a 
    > way that allows multiple sites per city. Two possible ways
    > to prove it to ARIN analysts are to provide an IP address
    > per site that can be tracerouted to show a unique path
    > or ISP bills/contracts that demonstrate one circuit per
    > site. I'm sure that there are other ways of proving site
    > count such as municipal tax bills, water bills, etc.

Okay, that seems reasonable.

                                -Bill