[ppml] tying back to 2005-1
Edward Lewis
Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz
Fri May 20 13:56:18 EDT 2005
I'm assuming that the mega-thread "IPv6>>32" and it's threadlets are
related to the proposed policy 2005-1.
I have a few questions in that context.
Is the policy's reference to "minimum size" saying that the
allocation is to be a prefix of /48?
"If the organization grows to require more space" - does this mean
that the organization has hit the HD ratio limit? Does the
organization have to register all of it's used addresses (SWIP?) to
indicate this?
Will such address allocations be "non-aggregatable?" Is the intent
to allocate these addresses from one segment of address space range
because of that?
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468
NeuStar
If you knew what I was thinking, you'd understand what I was saying.
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list