[ppml] IPv6>>32

[Owen DeLong]

> As for my personal opinion, yes I do think that the policy is perhaps
> a bit too generous, especially in the case for more commodity style
> Internet services like DSL/cable/dorm rooms/WLAN deployments.
> Therefore, I think it would make sense to add a category for this kind
> users which would broadly fit into what most people describe as "SOHO"
> users.

So... Just out of curiosity, what would your suggested policy for this
class of users be?  I tend to think /64 and possibly a new /56 category,
but, certainly I would have trouble thinking that relegating anyone
who might match the SOHO category to being unable to qualify for multiple
subnets is a bad idea.  I think the gains of octet boundaries are worth
the tradeoffs (the dns hacks to handle VLSM IN-ADDR delegation really
are hacky).

Owen



-- 
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20050516/fdd37f8e/attachment.sig>