[ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv6 HD ratio
kloch at hotnic.net
Tue May 10 15:24:25 EDT 2005
Randy Bush wrote:
> i suspect that some folk may not understand all of the implications.
> heck, i probably don't. but one would seem to be that it makes it
> even harder for the smaller folk and not too much harder for the larger.
You have it backwards:
(utilization threshold %)
/32 10.9% 51.4%
/20 2.1% 31.2%
The utilization threshold for a /20 is 15 times higher for /20
but only 5 times higher for a /32.
There are some good reasons to consider a flat threshold, but as long
as we are using HD it should at least be sane. Does anyone really think
a 50% utilization rate is opressive?
More information about the ARIN-PPML