[ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv6 HD ratio

[Kevin Loch]

Randy Bush wrote:
> i suspect that some folk may not understand all of the implications.
> heck, i probably don't.  but one would seem to be that it makes it
> even harder for the smaller folk and not too much harder for the larger.

You have it backwards:

   (utilization threshold %)
       HD=0.8   HD=0.94

/32    10.9%    51.4%
/20    2.1%     31.2%

The utilization threshold for a /20 is 15 times higher for /20
but only 5 times higher for a /32.

There are some good reasons to consider a flat threshold, but as long
as we are using HD it should at least be sane.  Does anyone really think
a 50% utilization rate is opressive?

- Kevin