[ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv6 HD ratio
billd at cait.wustl.edu
Tue May 10 12:59:25 EDT 2005
> > It seems to me following the various threads that there is little
> > resistance to the HD Ratio change.
> i suspect that some folk may not understand all of the
> implications. heck, i probably don't. but one would seem to
> be that it makes it even harder for the smaller folk and not
> too much harder for the larger.
Do you suggest a split level of HD Ratio requirement...one ratio for large
and another for small? If so, where would the demarc be?
More information about the ARIN-PPML