[ppml] /48 vs /32 micro allocations

[bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com]

On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 11:52:05PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I can think of at least one...
> 	The greater the sparsity of address utilization, the easier
> it is to hijack portions of the address space.  That, in and of itself,
> to me seems like a good reason NOT to pursue a sparse allocation policy.
> 
> Owen
> -- 
> If this message was not signed with gpg key 0FE2AA3D, it's probably
> a forgery.


	thanks Owen.  one down, two to go.  any other takers?

--bill