[ppml] Policy Proposal 2004-3 Global Addresses for Private Network Inter-Connectivity

[Owen DeLong]

Which of the myriad forms of private V6 space did you have in mind?
(I realize you say an argument for a different thread, but, since I think
that the current IETF proposal for theoretically private V6 space is
simply an end-run on registered address assignments, I think it is
important to settle the latter prior to encouraging the former.)

Owen


--On Tuesday, February 15, 2005 23:12 -0500 "Robert E.Seastrom" 
<ppml at rs.seastrom.com> wrote:

>
> Andrew Dul <andrew.dul at quark.net> writes:
>
>> At 11:31 AM 2/15/2005 -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
>>>> encouraged to use private IP address numbers
>>>
>>> i do not believe the above phrase, in particular the word "encouraged,"
>>> should occur anywhere
>>>
>>
>> Maybe we should encourage people to use IPv6 in the policy    :)
>
> While understanding that there are technical hurdles (particularly
> certain network vendors who remain wishy-washy in their v6 support)
> which stand in the way of implementation _today_, such barriers can be
> expected to become slowly lower over time, and proposals should be
> considered with an eye towards conditions next year and three years
> from now as well as conditions next month..
>
> I believe that we would be remiss in our stewardship duties if we did
> not include language along the lines of "Applicants are reminded of
> the comparatively finite nature of IPv4 address space and are
> encouraged to consider substituting IPv6 in private networks to the
> extent practicable" in any proposal that addresses globally unique
> addresses for private networks.
>
> We then need to put our money where our mouths are by vigorously
> supporting private v6 space, but that's an argument for another
> thread...
>
>                                         ---Rob
>
>



-- 
If this message was not signed with gpg key 0FE2AA3D, it's probably
a forgery.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20050216/f66c1000/attachment.sig>