[ppml] comments on 2004-8
Michael.Dillon at radianz.com
Michael.Dillon at radianz.com
Mon Apr 18 06:23:22 EDT 2005
> >If we are going to be making modifications to this one,
> >then I think it is time to say that these announcements
> >and web accessible documents should be in a machine-parseable
> >format. Something like RSS could be used or even just a plain
> >XML page. The current IANA list of address ranges is not
> >machine parseable and is not consistent from range to range.
> >There is no good reason why the list of ranges produced by
> >IANA should be broken (or aggregated) on class A boundaries.
> >If they have this info in a database, then it should be
> >trivial to report it as an XML file.
>
> As far as policy is concerned, I don't think that the details of the
> formatting, etc., are that important. I'd say that it is covered in
> the "will establish administrative procedures" phrase. (My comments
> are related to the flow of the announcements, not the contents of the
> announcements.)
>
> IANA's choice of data format isn't an ARIN problem, so I wouldn't
> attach that to this proposal in this arena.
This "arena" is not just for discussing ARIN policy text. That's
why I brought up the issue here. And while it is not appropriate
for ARIN to make a policy telling IANA what to do, it is certainly
appropriate for any interested party to post to this list and
tell IANA to publish their data in a machine parseable format
such as RPSL or XML or both.
IANA is broke, let's fix it!
--Michael Dillon
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list