[ppml] Policy Proposal 2005-2: Directory Services Overhaul

[Howard, W. Lee]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ppml at arin.net [mailto:owner-ppml at arin.net] On 
> Behalf Of Owen DeLong
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 5:03 PM
> To: Glenn Wiltse; Member Services
> Cc: ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2005-2: Directory 
> Services Overhaul
> 
> 
> >  Let me just ask about 'reclaim' a resource... Does that 
> mean if a ISP 
> > should assign a /24 to a customer, and that customer should commit 
> > these 'offenses', do you then reclaim a whole /14 or larger resorce 
> > that the /24 is part of?
> 

> 	There is no reason to believe that an ISP is going to 
> lose their /14 because a /24 within it is broken.  This is 
> unrealistic overreaching.  However, if a  /28 is delegated 
> lamely, and ARIN cannot reach the upstream ARIN subscriber, 
> then, ARIN would, IMHO, be right to suspend IN-ADDR service 
> for the relevant /24.  Eventually, the upstream subscriber 
> will either respond (in the form of renewal) or ARIN should 
> reclaim the resource anyway.

Wouldn't that impose collateral damage on the other /28 delegees 
surrounding them?  

Lee

> 
> 
> Owen
> 
> -- 
> If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
>