[ppml] Policy Proposal 2004-3: Global Addresses for Private Network Inter-Connectivity

[Owen DeLong]

It also begs the question of "Who gets to determine it is not possible?"

Owen


--On Thursday, April 1, 2004 5:56 -0800 Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:

>> a)  the organization has no intention of connecting to
>>     the Internet-either now or in the future-but it still
>>     requires a globally unique IP address.  The organization
>>     should consider using reserved addresses from RFC1918.
>>     If it is determined this is not possible, they can be
>                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>     issued unique (if not Internet routable) IP addresses.
>> It does not mandate following RFC 1918
>
> well, that "is not possible" is pretty strong.
>
> randy
>



-- 
If this message was not signed with gpg key 0FE2AA3D, it's probably
a forgery.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20040401/ed35d813/attachment.sig>