[ppml] Policy Proposal 2002-3

[McBurnett, Jim]

oops..
Thanks!
Jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Darte [mailto:billd at cait.wustl.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 12:00 AM
> To: McBurnett, Jim; 'Trevor Paquette '; 'calvin at orange-tree.alt.za ';
> 'ppml at arin.net '
> Subject: RE: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2002-3
> 
> 
> Not to nit pick your message, but for the sake of consistency...
> End Users indeed may receive "assignments" from ARIN.
> 
> Bill Darte
> ARIN AC
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: McBurnett, Jim
> To: Trevor Paquette; calvin at orange-tree.alt.za; ppml at arin.net
> Sent: 10/6/03 8:02 PM
> Subject: RE: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2002-3
> 
> Trevor,
> As far as I see, an end user can STILL
> get a direct allocation from ARIN.
> but that is for /20 or shorter..
> 2002-3, which I hugely favor, is for smaller blocks
> and based on the fact that a user is multihomed...
> http://www.arin.net/policy/2002_3.html
> 
> Jim
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Trevor Paquette [mailto:Trevor.Paquette at TeraGo.ca]
> > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 8:15 PM
> > To: calvin at orange-tree.alt.za; ppml at arin.net
> > Subject: RE: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2002-3
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Calvin Browne
> > > Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 6:06 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2002-3
> > > 
> > .... 
> > > Why should 2002-3 not be passed? or what are the arguments for not
> > > passing it?
> > 
> > Folks used to be able to receive direct assignments from ARIN 
> > (and other registries) in the past. This ability was revoked 
> > for some reason, and it seems that no-one can remember why...
> > 
> > I'd hate for us to go back down the same path and encounter 
> > the same problems as did our predecessors only to later go 
> > 'DOH!.. no wonder they revoked this ability'.
> > 
> > Why was this ability revoked and the current policy put in 
> > place?? Can anyone explain that?
> > 
> > 
>