[ppml]How far is too far?
Owen DeLong
owen at delong.com
Sun Oct 5 19:29:58 EDT 2003
You are correct... What I was remembering as that requirement is not there.
The actual requirement is somewhat different from what I stated.
It is contained in RFC 2050 on page 7 and reads as follows:
3. Assignment Framework
An assignment is the delegation of authority over a block of IP
addresses to an end enterprise. The end enterprise will use
addresses from an assignment internally only; it will not sub-
delegate those addresses. This section discusses some of the issues
involved in assignments and the framework behind the assignment of
addresses.
In order for the Internet to scale using existing technologies, use
of regional registry services should be limited to the assignment of
IP addresses for organizations meeting one or more of the following
conditions:
a) the organization has no intention of connecting to
the Internet-either now or in the future-but it still
requires a globally unique IP address. The organization
should consider using reserved addresses from RFC1918.
If it is determined this is not possible, they can be
issued unique (if not Internet routable) IP addresses.
b) the organization is multi-homed with no favored connection.
c) the organization's actual requirement for IP space is
very large, for example, the network prefix required to
cover the request is of length /18 or shorter.
I stand corrected, but, I still think this is sufficient requirement to
make it unnecessary to require an ASN as a prerequisite.
Owen
--On Saturday, October 4, 2003 9:42 PM -0400 Ron da Silva <ron at aol.net>
wrote:
>
> Owen,
>
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 09:00:59AM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> ...since the requirement already exists for end user assignments that the
>> end user be multihomed or have a unique routing policy...
>
> I'm having difficulty in finding this. My reading of end-user policy
> is simply that you have to justify space. There is no multihoming
> or unique routing requirements to obtain an assignment.
>
> http://www.arin.net/policy/ipv4.html#enduser
>
> Now, there are some additional ways of justification for 'allocations'
> (for ISPs) which include multihoming, but not that I can figure for
> end-user space.
>
> I could be missing something, so please point it out if I am!! :-)
>
> thanks,
> -ron
>
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list