[ppml] Policy Proposal 2003-1a: Required Performance of Abuse Contact

[Ron da Silva]

On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 08:24:18PM -0500, McBurnett, Jim wrote:
> Ok -
> I think I like this as written..
> BUT-- Am I understanding this correctly:
> SWIP Process and ORG--
> 	If an organization has been SWIPd a Class C and their 
> 		Upstreams allow them to use Private ASN for the 
> 		advertising of said Class C- That ORG is not an ORG
> 		according to this Policy?
> I am not saying this happens, but unless ARIN directly gives 
> the Resource to the user, does this apply to them?
> 
> I am thinking of a SPAMMER in S Fla..... The IP block is not SWIPPED to them
> and they have no ASN and don't seem fit this...
> 
> Not a problem for me.. I want to make sure we address ARIN Resposible ORGs and
> not every JOE.. (we just can't do that)

sounds like this proposal would ensure (in this case) that the upstream
who provided space to the spammer in S Fl would be required to maintain
responsive abuse contacts.

-ron