[ppml] Policy 2002-7

[Bill Darte]

Hello All,
Richard is correct.

The AC met via teleconference on January 16th to discuss outstand policy
proposals and other business.  The status of 2002-3 and 2002-7 was
ambiguous.  Both are quite similar.  Authors of both were invited to rewrite
their proposals and/or work together to eliminate the ambituity.  The
authors of 2003-3 have begun to rework their policy proposal and so it is
still viable.  Because the author of 2002-7 has not responded and because of
its similarity with 2002-3, the AC made a recommendation to the Board of
Trustess of ARIN to abandon consideration of 2002-7.  That recommendation
will presumably be considered during the next BoT meeting.

I thank you all for your interest in these proposals and of course I
understand from your emails that you think something in this area needs to
be done.  I encourage you to be specific in you interests.......what you
think needs to be done within a policy to mitigate some problem that you
face.  Posting clear and concise statements of problem and solutions as you
see them will likely help the authors of 2002-3 accomplish their edit with
the greatest possibility of creating an acceptable proposal.

Bill Darte
ARIN AC

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Jimmerson [mailto:richardj at arin.net]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 10:13 AM
> To: 'McBurnett, Jim'; 'Brian Wallingford'
> Cc: ppml at arin.net
> Subject: RE: [ppml] Policy 2002-7
> 
> 
> Hello Jim,
> 
> > Well noting that there was a letter to the authors. 
> > I think we should reevaluate this one.
> 
> After noting there was not community consensus to accept policy
> proposals 2002-3 and 2002-7, as written, the ARIN AC 
> requested the ARIN
> staff send a letter to the authors of the proposals.  The 
> letter pointed
> out that these two policy proposals were very similar and 
> that there was
> not consensus to accept either of them, as written.  The 
> letter provided
> feedback to their proposals as it was received on the mailing list and
> at the public policy meeting so they may refine them for further
> discussion.
> 
> The author of policy proposal 2002-7 has not yet submitted a revision,
> however, the authors of policy proposal 2002-3 have been working on a
> revision that will be posted back to this list for discussion 
> very soon.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Richard Jimmerson
> Director of Operations
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ppml at arin.net [mailto:owner-ppml at arin.net] On 
> > Behalf Of McBurnett, Jim
> > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 9:43 AM
> > To: Brian Wallingford
> > Cc: ppml at arin.net
> > Subject: RE: [ppml] Policy 2002-7
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks Brian!
> > 
> > 
> > Well noting that there was a letter to the authors. 
> > I think we should reevaluate this one.
> > I for one would benefit from this one.....
> > Anyone got comments?
> > Should we just kill it? 
> > Or should we move forward to help the small-mid sized companies?
> > Later,
> > Jim
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brian Wallingford [mailto:brian at meganet.net]
> > Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 11:08 PM
> > To: McBurnett, Jim
> > Cc: ppml at arin.net
> > Subject: Re: [ppml] Policy 2002-7
> > 
> > 
> > On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, McBurnett, Jim wrote:
> > 
> > :
> > :I think I missed something..
> > :Did this get passed?  Or is it still up in the air?
> > 
> > 
> > The most recent info available on 2002-7 is at:
> > http://www.arin.net/library/minutes/ac/ac2002_1122.html#7
> > 
> > It would appear that it hasn't passed yet.
> > 
> > -brian
> > 
>