[ppml] Draft 2 of proposal for ip assignment with sponsorship

[McBurnett, Jim]

I would rather not see this language. The policy states that ISP A or ISP B must inform ARIN
when this happens. I know we can't depend on this to work, but if we build in a backup, why even
ask ISP A or ISP B to inform ARIN of this change?

Jim
> 
> I think some sort of language saying that ARIN will do audits of the 
> assignments from time to time is needed.  Or perhaps when you 
> pay your 
> annual renewal fee, you should have to provide proof along 
> with it that 
> you are still connected to more than 1 upstream.  Basically 
> something that 
> will prevent someone from being multihomed today, get a micro 
> assignment, 
> and then drop their second provider while keeping their micro 
> assignment.
> 
> Forrest
> 
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 william at elan.net wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I'v made a 2nd draft for proposal for ip micro-assignment 
> with sponsorship.
> > It does not format well to be posted in the email as text 
> but you can 
> > review it online at:
> > 
> > 
> http://www.elan.net/~william/arin_proposal_for_micro_assignmen
> ts_with_sponsorship.htm
> > 
> > If you have any futher suggestions please feel free to 
> email me or otherwise
> > discuss it on this list. If there are no suggestions for 
> addition to the 
> > current text, this will be the proposal I will send to 
> Richard Jimmerson 
> > end of this week.
> > 
> > ----
> > William Leibzon
> > Elan Communications
> > william at elan.net
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>