jmcburnett at msmgmt.com
Fri Feb 14 12:21:27 EST 2003
>The issue of a fixed block size bothers me. I have noted that comments
>seem to set the lower limit to a /24. For an organization
>that does not
>provide hosting services to others, that size should be overkill in a
>world that requires organizations to have the core network NATed for a
>sensible security. If you look at the BGP routing tables, you will
>indeed find /25-/27 out there. Whether an organization pulls
>a /24 or a
>/27, its out on the net. Follow the heart of the idea on cidr to this
OKay, I agree that a /24 is overkill... BUT some ISPs will filter
small blocks I have seen it. CIDR is great, but some filter that too..
>Organizations can not be assigned more then one block. Mergers of
>companies that are each assigned a block must relinquish one
>in 180 days
>of the completed merger. Failure to do so voids both blocks and ASs.
This won't work. Company A merges with Company B. Offices in Canada and the US.
Large research facility in W city and corp HQ in X City with Manufactuering Plants
in Y and Z Cities. If more than 1 office is so critical they need to Multi-home,
this would prevent that if they are using /24s or they have to renumber for a
>Multihoming is not cheap. I will get hate mail for this probably but
>the proposed fees are too low. Make sure that those doing
>this have the
>resources to keep it going and ARIN has the resources to take it away.
>Failure to pay fees in a timely manner are grounds for voiding the
YES, it is not cheap. But the whole point is to make it easier for the
small-mid sized companies to multi-home. So you think ARIN and other RIR's
should become the finance police in a sense to prevent the fly by night from
becoming multi-homed and going under? If a company is that stupid, let em.
And then Let ARIN or Other RIR make the money for the extra assignments.
Failure to pay is always that way though...
Inflation is a bad thing, and competition in the market place to get those
high IP "lease" prices lowered at some ISP's is worth a lot..
Why should anyone pay $60 for 5 static IP addresses EVERY MONTH, from X provider?
in this case 1 is $40, so most pay the extra $20 and waste IP addresses.
Taking it away how ? ARIN can't change a routing table.
ARIN would need help from every backbone provider to do this..
>The issue here shouldn't be whether to do this but instead how to
>proceed. This is a needed solution that needs to be implemented.
I agree here... We need to discuss all options.
More information about the ARIN-PPML