[ppml] Question
CJ Wittbrodt
cjw at groovy.com
Mon Feb 3 21:54:58 EST 2003
There has been a project underway for quite some time. The RIRs
have been in the process of moving the pre-RIR address space allocations
to their appropriate RIR.
---CJ
From: "Eric B. Decker" <cire at deckerstone.net>
Subject: Re: [ppml] Question
>>>>> "jm" == McBurnett, Jim <jmcburnett at msmgmt.com> writes:
jm> Harsha,
jm> Unless I am wrong, I am willing to bet that ARIN
jm> has more swamp space than RIPE and APNIC combined,
jm> and don't forget the recent divesture of LACNIC..
jm> Anyway...
I beleive that is correct. I beleive that the Legacy space
allocations (pre-RIPE) show up in ARIN land.
-c
aso ac - ARIN
jm> This does sound awefully curious...
jm> J
>> Hi,
>> Do you mean that if an RIR uses up 80% of a /8, it gets a new /8 from
>> IANA?
>>
>> However, I found that 6 out of ARIN's 17 /8s were below 80%
>> utilization.
>>
>> The numbers for RIPE and APNIC are 3 out of 9 and 2 out of 9
>> respectively.
>>
>> Why is there a difference?
>>
>> Thank you very much for your reply.
>>
>> Harsha.
>> On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, John M. Brown wrote:
>>
>>> RFC 2050
>>>
>>> but I think the 80 percent rule should NOT be applied
>>> to RIR's. That would be a /8 for every 10 the get...
>>>
>>> It would also be handy if ICANN actually did an audit of
>>> the RIR's and their space allocations someday :)
>>>
>>> basicly, when the RIR thinks its going to run out, they
>>> ask IANA for another
>>>
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: owner-ppml at arin.net [mailto:owner-ppml at arin.net] On
>>> > Behalf Of Harsha Narayan
>>> > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 5:52 PM
>>> > To: ppml at arin.net
>>> > Subject: [ppml] Question
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Hello,
>>> > Could you please answer the following question?
>>> >
>>> > Under what circumstances or conditions does ARIN or any
>>> > other RIR get a new /8 fron IANA/ICANN?
>>> >
>>> > Harsha.
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list