[ppml] Policy Proposal 2003-4: IPv6 Policy Changes

[bmanning at karoshi.com]

> 
> >> Michel Py wrote:
> >> I don't think this is a mistake; I think this is a catastrophe.
> >> This would be the creation act of the IPv6 swamp. As much as I
> >> would like to have my own /48 PI block for home and have it
> >> appear in the global routing table this does not scale.
> 
> > Mury wrote:
> > If you notice the policy also specifies a date at which the space
> > holder MUST return the space and get new space from their LIR. So,
> > yes it does scale.
> 
> Oh yeah? The same way we cleaned the pre-CIDR swamp maybe.
> 
> Michel.

	Er... we reclaimed 17% of the total IPv4 space after
	CIDR and before ARIN was formed.

--bill