[ppml] Policy Proposal 2003-4: IPv6 Policy Changes

[Michel Py]

>> Michel Py wrote:
>> I don't think this is a mistake; I think this is a catastrophe.
>> This would be the creation act of the IPv6 swamp. As much as I
>> would like to have my own /48 PI block for home and have it
>> appear in the global routing table this does not scale.

> Mury wrote:
> If you notice the policy also specifies a date at which the space
> holder MUST return the space and get new space from their LIR. So,
> yes it does scale.

Oh yeah? The same way we cleaned the pre-CIDR swamp maybe.

Michel.