[ppml] Policy 2002-5

[Taylor, Stacy]

(Hi Dawn!)

We could change the sentence: 
ARIN staff shall, at their discretion, determine whether the smaller
replacement block shall be a subnet of the returned block, or a
block allocated from some different range. 

to:

The smaller replacement block shall be a subnet of the returned block.

Although, does that remove the carrot from the equation?

Is there a way to inform the blacklists that a block has been returned to
the registry and should be removed from the list?

Stacy


-----Original Message-----
From: Dawn Martin [mailto:dawn.martin at wcom.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 1:55 PM
To: 'Taylor, Stacy'; 'Trevor Paquette'; ppml at arin.net
Subject: RE: [ppml] Policy 2002-5


I'm not sure that returning a larger block of address space for a
slightly smaller block is enough reason to accept the exchange. Is
there a way for the ARIN staff to ensure that the space is "clean".
I don't know of a easy way of doing this, even over time the blocks
stay on lists long after the original SPAMer is gone.

Dawn Martin
WorldCom IP Planning & Policy Analyst
dawn.martin at wcom.com
(703)886-4746


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ppml at arin.net [mailto:owner-ppml at arin.net]On Behalf Of
Taylor, Stacy
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 3:04 PM
To: 'Trevor Paquette'; ppml at arin.net
Subject: RE: [ppml] Policy 2002-5


The block an organization would exchange would be for a smaller block only.
The goal is for organizations to turn in space they are already not using,
or could free up by consolidation.

-----Original Message-----
From: Trevor Paquette [mailto:Trevor.Paquette at TeraGo.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:27 AM
To: ppml at arin.net
Subject: RE: [ppml] Policy 2002-5


much better reading...

could this policy possibly be used to exchange blocks?

meaning.. get one of the SAME size because the original is getting 'dirty'
(blocked by blacklist etc?). I hope that the wording "shall receive a
smaller block", really means a SMALLER block; not one of the same size.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ppml at arin.net [mailto:owner-ppml at arin.net]On Behalf Of
> Taylor, Stacy
> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 12:14 PM
> To: 'ppml at arin.net'
> Subject: [ppml] Policy 2002-5
> 
> 
> Greetings All,
> 
> To make good on my campaign promise to make our policies 
> comply with the
> standards of the English language, I have altered policy 
> 2002-5.  How do you
> like this?
> 
> 
> If an organization, whether a member or non-member, ISP or end-user,
> relinquishes a larger block of portable address space to 
> ARIN, they shall be
> allowed to receive a smaller block, /24 or shorter, in exchange.   The
> organization will not be required to justify their use of the 
> new, smaller
> block.  The organization must return the block to be 
> exchanged within 12
> months.  ARIN staff shall, at their discretion, determine whether the
> smaller replacement block shall be a subnet of the returned 
> block, or a
> block allocated from some different range. 
> If any of the relinquished blocks had associated maintenance 
> fees, then the
> new block will be subject to the appropriate fees for that block size.
> Likewise those without maintenance fees shall remain so.
> 
> 
> I am also interested in continuing the discussion on the 
> relative merits of
> this policy.
> 
> Hope you had a great Thanksgiving!
> Stacy
>