[ppml] Wording issues with the 2002-6 Aggregation Requests Proposal???

[Craig A. Huegen]

On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Bill Darte wrote:

> Proposed.....
> If any organization relinquishes a group of portable, non-aggregatable
[...]

I'm fine with Bill's wording on this but would ask for another statement
to be added.  The new blocks should be aligned with the published "minimum
allocation" size.

For instance, if I were to return 3 /24's in exchange for a /22 from 205/8
space, I would expect that /22 to come out of space that had an allocation
policy of /22 or longer.  Otherwise, the organization is subject to some
filters presently in place on minimum prefix length based on registry
allocations.

/cah

---
Craig A. Huegen, Chief Network Architect      C i s c o  S y s t e m s
IT Transport, Network Technology & Design           ||        ||
Cisco Systems, Inc., 400 East Tasman Drive          ||        ||
San Jose, CA  95134, (408) 526-8104                ||||      ||||
email: chuegen at cisco.com       CCIE #2100      ..:||||||:..:||||||:..