Policy 6 - Single organizations with multiple aggregation poi nts

[Huff, Mark]

Nor can I guarantee sales in more than one discrete market will keep pace 
with all others. Under this policy one of my networks would be out of
business
because it reached 100% before I could accomplish 50% globally.

  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Borchers, Mark [mailto:mborchers at splitrock.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:18 AM
> To: ppml at arin.net
> Subject: RE: Policy 6 - Single organizations with multiple aggregation
> poi nts
> 
> 
> > This requirement defeats the purpose. If overall usage is 
> > measured then
> > the minimum assignment by the RIR, currently /20 needs to be 
> > increased.
> > If I am expected to rob from one network to support address 
> depletion 
> > in another the blocks must be globally routable.
> > 
> > 
> > mark huff
> > integra telecom
> 
> This is a new iteration of the old routability vs. address
> conservation dilemna.  Unfortunately, the above statement implies
> that ARIN should not only guarantee routability of a block (which
> it has always stopped short of doing), but also guarantee 
> routability of prefixes deaggregated by the registrant.  Probably
> asking a bit much.
>  
>