Last Call for Comment: Policy Proposal 2001-2

[Daniel Golding]

heh. In any case, I would find it somwhat hard to believe that this policy
would cause more perfidy on the part of customers. I suspect it would cause
less. Many of those deceptive customers are trying to get /24s so they can
multihome. I can't address the manhood of splitrock's customer base, though
:)

- Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Borchers, Mark [mailto:mborchers at splitrock.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:42 AM
> To: 'Daniel Golding'; Trevor Paquette; ppml at arin.net
> Subject: RE: Last Call for Comment: Policy Proposal 2001-2
>
>
> > 	In regard to your second point, I disagree that
> > customers will take
> > advantage of this policy to illegitimately secure IP space.
> > There is almost
> > no reason for a customer to request a /24 unless they intend
> > to multihome.
>
> Daniel, you are indeed fortunate, for you must have a
> customer base of superior rationality.
>
> In my experience, customers regard a /24 as evidence of
> their manhood and almost always lie to get it.
>
>