[arin-discuss] Fwd: [ARIN-Suggestions] New ACSP Suggestion 2014.10: CHANGES TO CANDIDATE SPEECHES
owen at delong.com
Thu Jun 5 03:26:03 EDT 2014
On Jun 4, 2014, at 5:18 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
> On Jun 4, 2014, at 8:04 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>> I oppose the implementation of this suggestion.
>> No rule prohibiting what Paul and I did existed prior to our doing it. I don’t see any way in which it impacted the integrity of the election process.
>> However, it has been made clear that such conduct is not desired and I see no reason that simply making that fact known is not sufficient. Going to written-only or pre-fabricated speeches is an unnecessary overreaction, IMHO.
> The proposed short-term resolution is effectively make that fact sufficiently known.
> Additionally, I was going to provide the suggestion as-is to the Board and Nomcom
> (as they periodically review the election process in general, and can decide if there
> is an more significant issue, and whether anything further is called for...)
> Does that seem satisfactory?
The short term solution seems satisfactory as a long-term solution.
I oppose modifying the process to require written-only or pre-fabricated speeches shot or long-term.
More information about the ARIN-discuss