[arin-discuss] IPv6 as justification for IPv4?
spiffnolee at yahoo.com
Tue Apr 16 11:41:18 EDT 2013
> From: Jesse D. Geddis <jesse at la-broadband.com>
>To: Lee Howard <spiffnolee at yahoo.com>
>Cc: Brian Jankovich <bjankovich at vaultnetworks.com>; Jawaid Bazyar <Jawaid.Bazyar at forethought.net>; "arin-discuss at arin.net" <arin-discuss at arin.net>
>Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 10:06 PM
>Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] IPv6 as justification for IPv4?
>What do apple, MIT, and HP an others have to do with ARIN fees? Perhaps you missed my point. MIT is paying $18,000 per year (it could be lower because they're legacy) to sit on as many IPs as the entire small tier is using and paying $5mil or thereabouts for. If MIT or apple or whoever were paying a proportionate amount there's a decent chance they would reconsider the cost/benefit of doing so and not hoard millions of IPs...
I have no information on the relationship between those organizations and ARIN, but since they are legacy end-user organizations, I doubt they pay ARIN anything, including attention.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-discuss