[arin-discuss] ARIN registration fee data (was: Status of realigning the IPv6 fee structure?)
jcurran at arin.net
Thu Mar 15 17:59:02 EDT 2012
On Mar 15, 2012, at 3:38 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Looks to me like the current scope of the problem is limited to $406,000
> in reduced revenue with an overall scope limit of $1,229,000+growth
> total scope.
> By that, I mean that if we simply declared /32 to be x-small and set the
> fee at $1,250, the loss to ARIN in revenue from current holders
> would be limited to the 406 currently paying based on their IPv6
> small status (or less) and that there is no possibility of it applying
> to more than the 1,229 x-small IPv4 members (+growth) even if
> everyone were to take up IPv6 resources tomorrow.
> Would that be an accurate conclusion from the data, John?
Your math appears correct. Unless you are expecting IPv4
address block returns, it would be unlikely to affect total
receipts aside from the initial change with IPv6 x-small.
In effect, the IPv4 fee schedule would always dominate, thus
making IPv6 "free" for those with IPv4 registration services.
Let me know if you need any additional information.
President and CEO
More information about the ARIN-discuss