[arin-discuss] IPv4 allocation conundrum

Erik Levitt elevitt at endstream.com
Sun Apr 18 19:02:30 EDT 2010


Randy,

ARIN should approve a /21 immediately if they are legitimately using it
and it can be SWIPed properly.  If you get 4 /24's from two providers in
addition to the /21, then you have a /20 worth of addresses, which means
you can apply for the /19.  

You can usually use private address space to justify public space with
ISPs.  

Given that I work for a VoIP interconnections provider I sympathize
about NAT.  Although some suggest that NAT transversal is elegant, I
would be to differ after watching customer after customer struggle to
make it work.  On the other end, given the lack of address space
resources left I sympathize with ARINs policy.  I wish that more people
would adopt v6 faster as we can't go to v6 on our edge until every
single one of our customers supports it, but I digress.

Regards,

Erik

-----Original Message-----
From: arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net
[mailto:arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Randy Carpenter
Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 6:50 PM
To: Ryan Duda
Cc: arin-discuss at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] IPv4 allocation conundrum


This seems futile when the absolute minimum they can get by with in the
short term is a /20.


-Randy

--
| Randy Carpenter
| V.P., IT Services
| First Network Group, Inc.
| Wapakoneta, OH
| (419)739-9240, x1
--


----- "Ryan Duda" <rpd at 123.net> wrote:

> Randy,
> 
> This is one road..
> 
> 1) Obtain an ASN, peer with Provider A and Provider B.
> 2) When the justification is there request an additional /24 from
> either 
> provider A or provider B.
> 3) Have efficient utilization of the 2 /24's.
> 4) Request a /22 from ARIN
> 
> 
> Ryan Duda
> 123.net
> 24275 Northwestern Hwy.
> Southfield, MI 48075
> Direct: 586.566.0564
> Fax: 586.620.8005
> NOC: 866.460.3503
> Email: rpd at 123.net
> 
> 
> 
> Randy Carpenter wrote:
> > They have a /24, but the ARIN policy states that if you need a /19,
> you already have to have 50% of that size already fully in use. Our
> specific situation is that the ISP was forced to use private IPs for
> purposes that should have been public to begin with.
> > 
> > 
> > -Randy
> > 
> > --
> > | Randy Carpenter
> > | V.P., IT Services
> > | First Network Group, Inc.
> > | Wapakoneta, OH
> > | (419)739-9240, x1
> > --
> > 
> > 
> > ----- "Tony Hain" <alh-ietf at tndh.net> wrote:
> > 
> >> IANAL ... but they already have public address space assigned by
> >> their
> >> provider. That may only be a /32, but that is still public, and it
> is
> >> assigned by their provider. It would likely help make the case if
> it
> >> were a
> >> static assignment, but dhcp is an assignment mechanism. YMMV
> >>
> >> Tony
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-discuss-
> >>> bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Randy Carpenter
> >>> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 7:56 PM
> >>> To: arin-discuss at arin.net
> >>> Subject: [arin-discuss] IPv4 allocation conundrum
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I am working with a new customer who is in a bit of a pickle...
> >>>
> >>> They are an ISP and VoIP provider whose upstream provider
> wouldn't
> >> (or
> >>> couldn't) give them many addresses.
> >>> They resorted to using NATed private IPs for most of their
> network,
> >>> which is causing problems for their end user customers.
> >>>
> >>> Now that we are working with them, I am trying to find a solution
> >> to
> >>> get them public IPs. They are also soon to be multi-homed (They
> have
> >> 2
> >>> connections, but no BGP yet). As an ISP, it would be best for
> them
> >> to
> >>> have PI space.
> >>>
> >>> The issue is that one of the requirements for getting PI space
> from
> >>> ARIN is that you are already using Public space that was assigned
> >> to
> >>> you from an upstream provider. I spoke with someone from ARIN who
> >> says
> >>> there is no way around this. The need around a /19 of space, and
> I
> >>> cannot find any way to get it for them. The upstream providers
> >> refuse
> >>> to give them any.
> >>>
> >>> What can be done about this?  Would would there be a requirement
> of
> >>> already using someone else's IP space to get your own? That seems
> >> like
> >>> a complete waste of time, effort, money, and IPs!
> >>>
> >>> -Randy
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> | Randy Carpenter
> >>> | V.P., IT Services
> >>> | First Network Group, Inc.
> >>> | RHCE
> >>> | (419)739-9240, x1
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> ARIN-Discuss
> >>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> >>> the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
> >>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> >>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
> >>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> > _______________________________________________
> > ARIN-Discuss
> > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> > the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
> > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
> > Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> > 
> >
_______________________________________________
ARIN-Discuss
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.



More information about the ARIN-discuss mailing list