[arin-discuss] Good Stewardship by example, I'd like to RETURN a /20

[Lee Howard]

> My opinion is that ARIN should not spend any additional money attempting to 
> convince legacy (or non legacy) resource holders to consolidate and return IPv4 
> address space. My reasons for this opinion are:

Thanks!  That's exactly the kind of comment I'm looking for.  

> At this point, the only policy related action that might help would be to allow 
> smaller organizations to get Provider Independent IPv6 address space. This has 
> the risk of increasing the size of the global routing tables, but it would also 
> increase the size of the IPv6 equipment market and put more pressure on upstream 
> providers to support IPv6.

You need to subscribe to ARIN-PPML http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
and discuss this proposal:
http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2009-May/014105.html
The AC expects to bring it to the October meeting in Dearborn, MI.
Seriously.


Lee