[ARIN-consult] Community Consultation on IRR Route Validation. attorney client communication.

[Hannigan, Martin]

> On Mar 31, 2015, at 4:52 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 08:28:08PM +0000, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
>> AS 32787 and AS 20940 will continue to use and expand use of RADB for the foreseeable future. 
> 
> So, what do you suggest how the gaping security problems of RADB can be
> solved?

The same as we would when they arise in any other IRR? Point fingers of shame, get commitments to fix or go elsewhere?

> 
> Now, I understand that you can buy a maintainer object, and thus protect
> your own address space - but as a user of the RADB, how can I see which
> objects are legitimate, and which (paid-for!) maintainers just put in
> stuff that does not belong to them?

How will that differ in an ARIN IRR? 

Best,

-M<