[ARIN-consult] [arin-announce] Fee Schedule Change Consultation
Jeremy Anthony Kinsey
jer at mia.net
Fri Nov 16 13:50:24 EST 2012
On Nov 16, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2012, at 17:32 , William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>>> Sorry, but as far as I'm concerned, the current state of the current proposal
>>> is ARIN picking a fight with the legacy holders that fell for the LRSA.
>> Hi Owen,
>> What fight? A regular RSA signatory can walk in to court, validly
>> claim contract of adhesion and then make the pitch that some portion
>> of the contract should be voided for unconscionability with adhesion
>> weighting the claim in his favor. An LRSA signatory doesn't even have
>> that: it isn't a contract of adhesion when nothing is denied him for
>> electing not to sign it.
>> If you sign the LRSA and come to dislike how ARIN's policies evolve,
>> you have no meaningful recourse. No fight to be fought.
> I have no problem with the policies.
> The proposed fee increases, OTOH...
Owen, just out of curiosity, are you going to see an increase?
More information about the ARIN-consult