[ARIN-consult] [arin-announce] Fee Schedule Change Consultation

[Brian Johnson]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: arin-consult-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-consult-
> bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 12:19 PM
> To: arin-consult at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [ARIN-consult] [arin-announce] Fee Schedule Change
> Consultation
> 
> 
> Brian Johnson <bjohnson at drtel.com> wrote:
>     >> > Under the new structure, the same situation would have the
>     >> XX-Small fee ($500). Is this correct?
>     >>
>     >> If the IPv4 block was /22, then it would be XX-Small ($500).
>     >> Since it is /21, the right category is X-Small (i.e. "Larger than
>     >> /22, up to and including /20"), and the revised fee is
>     >> $1000/annual.
> 
>     JC> Oops. I mistyped that and should have referenced a /22 and then
>     JC> I would have been correct.
> 
>     JC> Even so, under a IPv4 /21 or /20 (and/or an IPv6 /44 up to /36),
>     JC> the rate would be less than today by $250. Correct?
> 
> my understanding is:
> for v4/22 + v6/48, it would be $500+$500, so $250 less.
> but v4/21 + v6/48, it would be $1000+$500, I think.
> 

I believe this is incorrect.

You would pay the higher of the IPv6 or IPv4 fees by size. Also, you would not pay any ASN fee if you have number resources.

Using your examples:
for v4/22 + v6/48, it would be $500.
for v4/21 + v6/48, it would be $1000.

Board, et al... Please correct me if I am wrong.

Thank you.

- Brian

> --
> Michael Richardson
> -on the road-