[ARIN-consult] [arin-announce] Fee Schedule Change Consultation

[Brian Johnson]

Thank you for the response John.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Curran [mailto:jcurran at arin.net]
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 9:21 AM
> To: Brian Johnson
> Cc: arin-consult at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [ARIN-consult] [arin-announce] Fee Schedule Change
> Consultation
> 
> On Nov 5, 2012, at 10:10 AM, Brian Johnson <bjohnson at drtel.com>
>  wrote:
> 
> > I have 2 questions that may be illustrative:
> >
> > 1. If I have IPv4 space and a single ASN and request IPv6 space under the
> current fee structure and the request doesn't change my RSSP size category,
> will I be charged any more than I am currently?
> >
> 
> > 2. Per question 1... Will this change under the new fee structure?
> 
> If IPv6 block requested does not change your size category, then your
> annual RSSP fee will not change, either presently or under the proposed
> schedule.
> 
> > Keep in mind, I know there are more situations, but let me be clear by
> example:
> >
> > An organization has 1 ASN, a single IPv4 /21 and is requesting an IPv6 /48
> for their use. Under the current fee structure, I believe the bill would be the
> X-Small fee ($1250). Is this correct?
> 
> Correct.
> 
> > Under the new structure, the same situation would have the XX-Small fee
> ($500). Is this correct?
> 
> If the IPv4 block was /22, then it would be XX-Small ($500).  Since it is /21,
> the right category is X-Small (i.e. "Larger than /22, up to and including /20"),
> and the revised fee is $1000/annual.

Oops. I mistyped that and should have referenced a /22 and then I would have been correct.

Even so, under a IPv4 /21 or /20 (and/or an IPv6 /44 up to /36), the rate would be less than today by $250. Correct?

> 
> Note that the IPv6 block could be "Larger than /48, up to and including /36"
> and
> the organization would still stay in the X-Small category under the new
> proposed
> fee/category schedule.
> 
> FYI,
> /John
> 
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> ARIN
>